Monday, June 28, 2010

What Life Should Mean to You

Adler, A. 1933. What Life Should Mean To You. London : George Allen & Unwin Ltd

Chapter XII
Love and Marriage

“Love with its fulfilment, marriage, is the most intimate devotion towards a partner of the other sex, expressed in physical attraction, in comradeship, and in the decision to have children. It can easily be shown that love and marriage are one side of cooperation – not cooperation for the welfare of two persons only, but cooperation also for the welfare of mankind”. ... Adler (1933), p.263 ... we are living in two sexes with the future of our race dependent on the relations of these two sexes ... There are other human beings who are not so much concerned with the welfare of mankind. Instead of taking as their underlying view of life “What can I contribute to my fellows?” “How can I fit in as part of the whole?”, they ask rather, “What is the use of life? What can I get out of it? What does it pay? Are other people considering me enough? Am I properly appreciated? If this attitude is behind an individual’s approach to life, he will try to solve the problem of love and marriage in the same way. He will ask always: “What can I get out of it?”.

...We could even say that for a full solution of this cooperation of two, each partner must be more interested in the other than in himself. This is the only basis on which love and marriage can be successful. ...If each partner is to be more interested in the other partner than in himself, there must be equality. ..Equality is only possible if both partners have this attitude. It should be the effort of each to ease and enrich the life of the other. In this way each is safe. Each feels that he is worthwhile: each feels that he is needed... that you cannot be replaced.

It is not possible for a partner in a cooperative task to accept a position of subservience. Two people cannot live together fruitfully if one wishes to rule and force the other to obey.” Adler (1933), Chapter XII.


It is a really solemn day today being the last day of University. However, this closure has opened many exciting doors and I am really looking forward to moving on as a Social Entrepreneur. I must say I did have the opportunity to read many insightful books over the course of the last 3 years to include Alfred Adler’s “What Life Should Mean to You”, edited by Alan Porter, 1933. It has taken me some time to complete reading this book amongst essay writing but in the last 10 days I returned to it to read the final chapter which I have had on hold for some time. I am wondering whether it has anything to do with what the final chapter is all about ‘Love and Marriage’?

Well I can let you know it was definitely a fascinating read, even though some might find it a bit dated about views on cooperation amongst the sexes. I would have loved to transcribe the whole chapter here but would recommend you finding it in a library and reading this chapter for yourself. I can only provide an extract as painful as it might be for some of us on the subject of Love and Marriage. I can confirm insightful learnings about devotion to a partner and vice versa.

This is one book I would like to add to my personal library to return to every now and then. There are plenty of insights on the behaviours of pampered or neglected individuals and ‘private’ agreement ideas about freedom within marriage that can get some into difficulties who may have an underlying reason to escape from responsibility.

I will end on Adler’s final words: "From all we have said we can draw a simple, obvious and helpful conclusion. Human beings are neither polygamous nor monogamous. The fact that we live on this plant, in association with human beings equal to ourselves, and divided into two sexes, and the fact that we must solve the three problems of life with our circumstances set us in a sufficient way, will help us to see that the fullest and highest development of the individual in love and marriage can best be secured by monogamy.”

Editor

According to Adler, “Individual Psychology has found no problems in life which cannot be grouped under these three main problems – occupational, social and sexual. It is in his response to these three problems that every individual human being unfailingly reveals his own deep sense of meaning of life”. Adler (1933), p.7.

However, in this modern world some may feel that they have found their own 'rigid' solution to these problems, even if it might get them into even more difficulties.

Adler, A. 1933. What Life Should Mean To You. London : George Allen & Unwin Ltd

Thursday, June 24, 2010

"Desireless"

Today I have something to say about the state of being 'desireless'.  Why specifically?  Because I wonder if somewhere at a deeper psychological level there might be some benefit derived from it.  I say desireless and not emotionless, as to desire or to not desire will inevitably evoke a certain kind of emotional state unique to each individual.  I suppose one could then ask 'is there anything that you or I want'?  The likely answer is 'everything' in terms of most things that others want too, to evoke the state of being happy.  However, I do wonder when we think of the polarities of the act to desire more or to desire less whether this could be subject to an analysis?

In my view I believe so and have the following to say:


DESIRELESS

Desire less,
Desire more,
I wonder, what exactly for?

Desire less,
For the purpose of
Less stress.

Desire more,
For the purpose of
Only the best.

Desire less is one
End of the polarity
And desire more is the other.

However, ‘desireless’ is an ultimate state of
Independence free of anxiety,
That sits between less or more
And brings a matachless state of peace to the fore.

(c) Jennifer Hooper June 2010

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

The Power of Metaphors

Continuing on the same lines that metaphors do not have to make any sense at all, then I suppose it is up to the reader to make the sense that they wish to make of it.

When related to abuse of another or others I guess the learnings can be quite profound can't they.

Every minute at least one phone call is made to the police about domestic violence and estimated 26 billion a year problem and debt to the UK.

If you know of anyone who is being abused by domestic violence the new intiative by the police is to let them know if you are a victim or you know of a victim.

It is a hard hitting message knowing that someone that you love can abuse you and everyone has a choice to get help for it to STOP.  In my view, loving an abuser is not the cause of the problem, the abuse is the problem, as it is the destructive, projective and negative behaviours of the abuser that needs to change.

VIDEOS

Help Make it Stop!
http://www.youtube.com/helpmakeitstop
The Editor
High Risk DV Practitioner

Saturday, June 12, 2010

An Abstract Metaphor

"When someone talks about investment in a relationship I wonder what they mean? Do they mean time, money, companionship, all of these things, or none of these things, because they did not do the investment, the other person did? So when years and years have gone by and you have not stayed just for the children as some do and there is a wish to make 'it' work, when do you realise that wishes can’t make it work, it works itself, in or out or with someone else? Because it’s easy, isn’t it – to walk away and not take responsibility for experimenting with people’s lives on your journey of living. So I wonder how it really feels to promise love only to feather one’s own nest until ...

I do wonder how Erickson would deal with this metaphor. Would he know just like you do which end of the polarity you are on in this moment, or would he somehow have to give yet another metaphor for you to get it, as you do get it don’t you? You always knew the person you were at the time with the skills that you had at the time. So the learning? Something to do with experimenting ..., and the feedback?

In your own time, you can use this space to discover your own learnings and behave differently, can’t you."


The use of high level abstract thought does not have to make any sense at all.  However, two things might be worth considering:

1) What's the purpose of the high level abstract thought?   2) What preserved learnings and feelings does unconscious communication get for you?

The Editor