Narcissistic Withdrawal
For those of you with a love of poetry I shall leave it to you to work out the stanza form. For others in relationships that are not working, I shall leave it to you for analysis, for this is the very thing that led me to writing it in the first place. Of course, it is based on Freud's 1908 original idea of 'loss of a significant object', that is a person, taken from his in depth and lengthy discussion on Narcissism. Further, it does bear some reflections on the myth of Narcissus. Moreover, I do wonder if in a trivial and yet destructive way the loss of the object could be triggered much later in a person by some kind of unconscious 'castration complex' that Freud also mentioned frequently in his works, that may in a new form exhibit itself in either sex in adulthood associated to loss of power or phantasies of emasculation? However, bringing things up-to-date we can all see how merely being an extension to an intimate other is a rather complex relationship. Can't we.
Narcissistic Withdrawal
A I wonder where have you gone to?
B I see and hear no Echo, echo, echo...
A I sense a kind of symptom too.
B What has ruined the image deco?
B It seems that only you might show,
C Return of engery to libido.
B Flight from the object as I know,
C Seems to be an objectless flow.
A What has led to this anxious situation?
B Lack of control of the object,
A And a present link to symbolic castration.
B Or is it merely the subject,
B Love of the object or it reject?
C Libidinal energy one must protect,
B To block the shift of the effects,
C A defence used to deflect.
A And so the story continues,
B The echo is then to retain,
A A sense of grandiose in you,
B Admiration in a domain,
B All for the purpose to avoid pain.
C How does one then recover,
B And not persue this path of vain?
C To: share libido with the other.
B All for the purpose to avoid pain,
C How does one then recover,
B And not persue this path of vain?
C To: share libido with the other.
(c) Jennifer Hooper 2009